Microsoft made such a mess of Windows 8 that they went straight to 10 to look like a significant improvement.
Dang, we must be much worse than them then, since we went directly from QB45 to QB64!
Honestly, and with all joking aside, I can’t help but wonder what people’s obsession with Windows 9 is. It’s not like the others fall into a pattern either!
First there was Windows, Windows 2, and Windows 3. The next version
had to be Windows 4. Right?
Errr…. Nope! It was Windows 3.11.
But the NEXT versions were Windows 4, 5, and 6. Right??
Errr…. Nope! We got Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows Vista, and THEN Windows 7!
No 4, 5, or 6, but it was 7 versions after 3.11 that we got Windows 7! Go figure.
Then, somehow, we go to Windows 8, then to 8.1…
And from this “predictable pattern” of naming convention, folks somehow think the next version should’ve been Windows 9?
Honestly, I wouldn’t be surprised if the next version was Windows 2030 (based on end support date for the name), Windows Applebutter (cause it’s better than just Apples), or Windows Services (as they fully turn to a service based OS that costs $9.99 per month to use). I truly see no reason why folks would think there needed to be a Windows 9, nor why they’d expect the next version to be Windows 11.
At the end of the day, they’re all nothing more than just names for “Windows”.