Author Topic: Binary Search  (Read 4445 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline codeguy

  • Forum Regular
  • Posts: 174
    • View Profile
Binary Search
« on: May 16, 2020, 04:02:39 am »
I have noticed there is no code for Binary Search, a very valuable weapon for finding things in large sorted arrays.
Code: [Select]
'********************
'* Binary search is roughly the way one seeks a particular name entry in a sorted
'* phone directory. It examines the middle element and disregards the half this
'* searched object cannot be in. For very long lists and arrays It is MUCH faster
'* than linear search which must look through all entries until a match is found or
'* the end of the list is reached without a match. This version of Binary Search
'' quits as soon as a match is found or the indexes BinarySearch_L and BinarySearch_H
'* cross, which indicates the item being searched simply is not contained in the
'* searched list. The average number of iterations for Binary Search is
'* 1 + Floor(Log(BinarySearch_Finish - BinarySearch_Start + 1) / Log(2))
'* Binary search cannot be used on unsorted arrays or lists. This version also avoids
'* overflow when calculating BinarySearch_M, a hidden mistake programmers can very
'* easily overlook. Every doubling of input size makes this search algorithm perform
'* only 1 more very fast itertation of the Binary Search code body, making this a
'* logarithmic class complexity. The official complexity classification is O(LogN).
'********************
SUB BinarySearch (CGSortLibArr() AS _INTEGER64, BinarySearch_Start AS _INTEGER64, BinarySearch_Finish AS _INTEGER64, BinarySearch_SearchTarget AS _INTEGER64, BinarySearch_where AS _INTEGER64, BinarySearch_errorflag AS INTEGER)
    BinarySearch_errorflag = 0
    '********************    These must be the same numerical type as the variable parameters they hold.
    DIM BinarySearch_L AS _INTEGER64: BinarySearch_L = BinarySearch_Start
    DIM BinarySearch_M AS _INTEGER64: BinarySearch_M = BinarySearch_Start
    DIM BinarySearch_H AS _INTEGER64: BinarySearch_H = BinarySearch_Finish
    '********************
    DO
        IF (BinarySearch_H - BinarySearch_L) AND 1 THEN
            BinarySearch_C = BinarySearch_L + (BinarySearch_H - BinarySearch_L - 1) / 2
        ELSE
            BinarySearch_C = BinarySearch_L + (BinarySearch_H - BinarySearch_L) / 2
        END IF
        IF CGSortLibArr(BinarySearch_C) < BinarySearch_SearchTarget THEN
            BinarySearch_L = BinarySearch_C + 1
        ELSE
            IF CGSortLibArr(BinarySearch_C) > BinarySearch_SearchTarget THEN
                BinarySearch_H = BinarySearch_C - 1
            ELSE
                BinarySearch_where = BinarySearch_C
                EXIT SUB
            END IF
        END IF
    LOOP UNTIL BinarySearch_L > BinarySearch_H
    BinarySearch_errorflag = -1
END SUB
« Last Edit: May 16, 2020, 04:20:14 am by codeguy »

Offline STxAxTIC

  • Library Staff
  • Forum Resident
  • Posts: 1091
  • he lives
    • View Profile
Re: Binary Search
« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2020, 06:24:05 am »
What's this? codeguy giving us an update? Good to see ya meng.

If you are able to append this post with a full-blown working example using actual data, it will become a Sample.
You're not done when it works, you're done when it's right.

Offline codeguy

  • Forum Regular
  • Posts: 174
    • View Profile
Re: Binary Search
« Reply #2 on: May 16, 2020, 09:23:13 pm »
This will expand to at least include a linear search for comparison. However, I wanted to post code as I would write it in an actual production environment first. This is the abstraction of all the knowledge that goes into the harder but doable explanation as I did in the comments. Patience, Grasshopper.

Offline STxAxTIC

  • Library Staff
  • Forum Resident
  • Posts: 1091
  • he lives
    • View Profile
Re: Binary Search
« Reply #3 on: May 16, 2020, 09:44:52 pm »
Patience, Grasshopper.

Ooookay then! Must be a karate kid reference or something...
You're not done when it works, you're done when it's right.

Offline codeguy

  • Forum Regular
  • Posts: 174
    • View Profile
Re: Binary Search
« Reply #4 on: May 16, 2020, 10:20:10 pm »
This demo shows the VAST difference in efficiency between Binary Search and Linear Search. This demo takes just a little less than 90s to complete on my modest machine. Somewhere around 83s including the very nicely coded Iterative QuickSort from my sorting library, slightly modified to use _INTEGER64 rather than 32-bit LONG. This is enough to clearly demonstrate a difference worth adding to your searching arsenal. Conservatively 200 times faster for Binary Search versus Linear search at N=16777216. Believe me, you don't want to perform the Linear Search until it has completed the exact same entire array search Binary Search does. It will take FAR longer than 200 times as long to finish.

Code: [Select]
TYPE range
    lower AS _INTEGER64
    upper AS _INTEGER64
END TYPE
TYPE ArrayDescript
    ArrayBounds AS range
    ArraySorted AS range
    index AS _INTEGER64
END TYPE
REDIM SearchedArray(0 TO 16777215) AS _INTEGER64
REDIM SearchedArrayD AS ArrayDescript
SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower = LBOUND(SearchedArray)
SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper = UBOUND(SearchedArray)
SearchedArrayD.ArraySorted.lower = LBOUND(SearchedArray)
SearchedArrayD.ArraySorted.upper = LBOUND(SearchedArray)
SetArray SearchedArray(), SearchedArrayD, 0, 16777216

PRINT "sorting..."; (SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper - SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower + 1); TIMER(.001)
QuickSortIterative SearchedArray(), SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower, SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper, 1
PRINT "sorted..."; TIMER(.001)
PRINT "PERFORMING SERACH OF ALL ELEMENTS USING BINARY SEARCH"
DIM SearchedArray_where AS _INTEGER64
BinarySearchsTART! = TIMER(.001)
DO
    'PRINT SearchedArray(SearchedArrayD.index)
    BinarySearch SearchedArray(), SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower, SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper, SearchedArray(SearchedArrayD.index), SearchedArray_where, SearchedArray_error
    IF SearchedArray_error THEN
        STOP
    ELSE
        SearchedArrayD.index = SearchedArrayD.index + 1
    END IF
LOOP UNTIL SearchedArrayD.index > SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper
BinarySearchFinish! = TIMER(.001)
PRINT "Binary Search took "; BinarySearchFinish! - BinarySearchsTART!; " seconds"
SearchedArrayD.index = SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower
DIM LinearSearchStart!: LinearSearchStart! = TIMER(.001)
DIM LinearSearchfINISH!: LinearSearchfINISH! = LinearSearchStart!
DIM LSI AS _INTEGER64
DIM lSIeRROR AS INTEGER: lSIeRROR = 0
PRINT "Starting linear search until time meets or exceeds time used by Binary Search"
DO
    LSI = SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower
    DO
        IF LSI > SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper THEN
            lSIeRROR = -1
            EXIT DO
        END IF
        IF SearchedArray(LSI) = SearchedArray(SearchedArrayD.index) THEN EXIT DO
        LSI = LSI + 1
    LOOP
    IF lSIeRROR THEN
        STOP
    END IF
    SearchedArrayD.index = SearchedArrayD.index + 1
    LinearSearchfINISH! = TIMER(.001)
LOOP UNTIL (LinearSearchfINISH! - LinearSearchStart!) > BinarySearchFinish! - BinarySearchsTART! OR SearchedArrayD.index > SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper
PRINT "LINEAR SEARCH FOUND"; SearchedArrayD.index; "iTEMS IN THE TIME BINARY SEARCH DID."
PRINT "Binary search performed "; (SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper - SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower + 1) / SearchedArrayD.index; "times faster."
PRINT "yet Linear Search was only able to cover"; 100 * (SearchedArrayD.index / (SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper - SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower + 1)); "%."


'* simply fills a numeric array with numbers between SetArray_min and SetArray_max, inclusively
'* in a large enough array, SetArray_min and SetArray_max will appear at least once.
SUB SetArray (a() AS _INTEGER64, ArrayD AS ArrayDescript, SetArray_min AS _INTEGER64, SetArray_max AS _INTEGER64)
    ArrayD.index = ArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower
    DO
        a(ArrayD.index) = SetArray_min + (SetArray_max - SetArray_min) * RND
        ArrayD.index = ArrayD.index + 1
    LOOP UNTIL ArrayD.index > ArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper
    ArrayD.index = ArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower
END SUB

'********************
'* Binary search is roughly the way one seeks a particular name entry in a sorted
'* phone directory. It examines the middle element and disregards the half this
'* searched object cannot be in. For very long lists and arrays It is MUCH faster
'* than linear search which must look through all entries until a match is found or
'* the end of the list is reached without a match. This version of Binary Search
'' quits as soon as a match is found or the indexes BinarySearch_L and BinarySearch_H
'* cross, which indicates the item being searched simply is not contained in the
'* searched list. The average number of iterations for Binary Search is
'* 1 + Floor(Log(BinarySearch_Finish - BinarySearch_Start + 1) / Log(2))
'* Binary search cannot be used on unsorted arrays or lists. This version also avoids
'* overflow when calculating BinarySearch_M, a hidden mistake programmers can very
'* easily overlook. Every doubling of input size makes this search algorithm perform
'* only 1 more very fast itertation of the Binary Search code body, making this a
'* logarithmic class complexity. The official complexity classification is O(LogN).
'********************
SUB BinarySearch (CGSortLibArr() AS _INTEGER64, BinarySearch_Start AS _INTEGER64, BinarySearch_Finish AS _INTEGER64, BinarySearch_SearchTarget AS _INTEGER64, BinarySearch_where AS _INTEGER64, BinarySearch_errorflag AS INTEGER)
    BinarySearch_errorflag = 0
    '********************    These must be the same numerical type as the variable parameters they hold.
    DIM BinarySearch_L AS _INTEGER64: BinarySearch_L = BinarySearch_Start
    DIM BinarySearch_C AS _INTEGER64: BinarySearch_M = BinarySearch_Start
    DIM BinarySearch_H AS _INTEGER64: BinarySearch_H = BinarySearch_Finish
    '********************
    DO
        IF (BinarySearch_H - BinarySearch_L) AND 1 THEN
            BinarySearch_C = BinarySearch_L + (BinarySearch_H - BinarySearch_L - 1) / 2
        ELSE
            BinarySearch_C = BinarySearch_L + (BinarySearch_H - BinarySearch_L) / 2
        END IF
        IF CGSortLibArr(BinarySearch_C) < BinarySearch_SearchTarget THEN
            BinarySearch_L = BinarySearch_C + 1
        ELSE
            IF CGSortLibArr(BinarySearch_C) > BinarySearch_SearchTarget THEN
                BinarySearch_H = BinarySearch_C - 1
            ELSE
                BinarySearch_where = BinarySearch_C
                EXIT SUB
            END IF
        END IF
    LOOP UNTIL BinarySearch_L > BinarySearch_H
    BinarySearch_errorflag = -1
END SUB

SUB QuickSortIterative (CGSortLibArr() AS _INTEGER64, QSIStart AS _INTEGER64, QSIFinish AS _INTEGER64, order&)
    DIM QSI_Local_Compare AS DOUBLE '* MUST be same type as element of CGSortLibArr()
    '* These MUST be the appropriate type for the range being sorted
    DIM QSI_Local_I AS _INTEGER64
    DIM QSI_local_J AS _INTEGER64
    DIM QSI_Local_Hi AS _INTEGER64
    DIM QSI_Local_Low AS _INTEGER64
    DIM QSI_Local_Mid AS _INTEGER64
    '****************************************************************

    '* Integer suffices for QSI_Local_MinStackPtr unless you're sorting more than 2^32767 elements.
    DIM QSI_Local_MinStackPtr AS INTEGER: QSI_Local_MinStackPtr = 0
    DIM QSI_Local_QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr AS INTEGER: QSI_Local_QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr = 0
    DIM QSI_Local_FinishMinusStart AS _INTEGER64: QSI_Local_FinishMinusStart = QSIFinish - QSIStart
    DIM QSI_local_Remainder AS INTEGER

    '* yes, the equation log(QSIfinish-QSIstart)/log(2)+1 works too
    DO
        QSI_local_Remainder = QSI_Local_FinishMinusStart - (2 * INT(QSI_Local_FinishMinusStart / 2))
        QSI_Local_FinishMinusStart = (QSI_Local_FinishMinusStart - QSI_local_Remainder) / 2
        QSI_Local_MinStackPtr = QSI_Local_MinStackPtr + 1
    LOOP UNTIL QSI_Local_FinishMinusStart < 1

    '* MUST be appropriate type to handle the range (QSIfinish-QSIstart) being sorted
    DIM QSI_LStack(0 TO QSI_Local_MinStackPtr, 0 TO 1) AS _INTEGER64

    QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr = 0
    QSI_LStack(QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr, 0) = QSIStart
    QSI_LStack(QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr, 1) = QSIFinish
    DO
        QSI_Local_Low = QSI_LStack(QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr, 0)
        QSI_Local_Hi = QSI_LStack(QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr, 1)
        DO
            QSI_Local_I = QSI_Local_Low
            QSI_local_J = QSI_Local_Hi
            QSI_Local_Mid = QSI_Local_Low + (QSI_Local_Hi - QSI_Local_Low) \ 2
            QSI_Local_Compare = CGSortLibArr(QSI_Local_Mid)
            SELECT CASE order&
                CASE 1
                    DO
                        DO WHILE CGSortLibArr(QSI_Local_I) < QSI_Local_Compare
                            QSI_Local_I = QSI_Local_I + 1
                        LOOP
                        DO WHILE CGSortLibArr(QSI_local_J) > QSI_Local_Compare
                            QSI_local_J = QSI_local_J - 1
                        LOOP
                        IF QSI_Local_I <= QSI_local_J THEN
                            SWAP CGSortLibArr(QSI_Local_I), CGSortLibArr(QSI_local_J)
                            QSI_Local_I = QSI_Local_I + 1
                            QSI_local_J = QSI_local_J - 1
                        END IF
                    LOOP UNTIL QSI_Local_I > QSI_local_J
                CASE ELSE
                    DO
                        DO WHILE CGSortLibArr(QSI_Local_I) > QSI_Local_Compare
                            QSI_Local_I = QSI_Local_I + 1
                        LOOP
                        DO WHILE CGSortLibArr(QSI_local_J) < QSI_Local_Compare
                            QSI_local_J = QSI_local_J - 1
                        LOOP
                        IF QSI_Local_I <= QSI_local_J THEN
                            SWAP CGSortLibArr(QSI_Local_I), CGSortLibArr(QSI_local_J)
                            QSI_Local_I = QSI_Local_I + 1
                            QSI_local_J = QSI_local_J - 1
                        END IF
                    LOOP UNTIL QSI_Local_I > QSI_local_J
            END SELECT
            IF QSI_local_J - QSI_Local_Low < QSI_Local_Hi - QSI_Local_I THEN
                IF QSI_Local_I < QSI_Local_Hi THEN
                    QSI_LStack(QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr, 0) = QSI_Local_I
                    QSI_LStack(QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr, 1) = QSI_Local_Hi
                    QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr = QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr + 1
                END IF
                QSI_Local_Hi = QSI_local_J
            ELSE
                IF QSI_Local_Low < QSI_local_J THEN
                    QSI_LStack(QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr, 0) = QSI_Local_Low
                    QSI_LStack(QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr, 1) = QSI_local_J
                    QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr = QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr + 1
                END IF
                QSI_Local_Low = QSI_Local_I
            END IF
        LOOP WHILE QSI_Local_Low < QSI_Local_Hi
        QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr = QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr - 1
    LOOP UNTIL QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr < 0
END SUB
« Last Edit: May 17, 2020, 03:51:21 pm by codeguy »

Offline STxAxTIC

  • Library Staff
  • Forum Resident
  • Posts: 1091
  • he lives
    • View Profile
Re: Binary Search
« Reply #5 on: May 16, 2020, 10:34:38 pm »
Thanks for the update. So eventually we will need this example to be further dumbed down for the sake of a nice and transparent library entry.

Something seems off to me though when I scan the code. Is "mun" below supposed to read "min"?

Code: QB64: [Select]
  1. SUB SetArray (a() AS _INTEGER64, ArrayD AS ArrayDescript, min, max)
  2.     ArrayD.index = ArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower
  3.     DO
  4.         a(ArrayD.index) = mun + (max - min) * RND
  5.         ArrayD.index = ArrayD.index + 1
  6.     LOOP UNTIL ArrayD.index > ArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper
  7.     ArrayD.index = ArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower
You're not done when it works, you're done when it's right.

FellippeHeitor

  • Guest
Re: Binary Search
« Reply #6 on: May 16, 2020, 10:35:12 pm »
Option explicit to the rescue.

Offline codeguy

  • Forum Regular
  • Posts: 174
    • View Profile
Re: Binary Search
« Reply #7 on: May 16, 2020, 10:44:25 pm »
Duly noted and corrected, STxAxTIC. Good catch. Post for demo code updated. Note that even with linear search as inline main code (no subroutine jumps), it is STILL terrible. I recommend Linear search only for few items or last resort when QuickSort cannot manage successful completion.
« Last Edit: May 16, 2020, 10:50:46 pm by codeguy »

Offline codeguy

  • Forum Regular
  • Posts: 174
    • View Profile
Re: Binary Search
« Reply #8 on: May 16, 2020, 11:03:59 pm »
Thanks for the update. So eventually we will need this example to be further dumbed down for the sake of a nice and transparent library entry.

Something seems off to me though when I scan the code. Is "mun" below supposed to read "min"?

Code: QB64: [Select]
  1. SUB SetArray (a() AS _INTEGER64, ArrayD AS ArrayDescript, min, max)
  2.     ArrayD.index = ArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower
  3.     DO
  4.         a(ArrayD.index) = mun + (max - min) * RND
  5.         ArrayD.index = ArrayD.index + 1
  6.     LOOP UNTIL ArrayD.index > ArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper
  7.     ArrayD.index = ArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower

The Binary Search subroutine is already simple as possible, the code pared to the fewest concise lines possible without resorting to spaghetti code. And yes, I did correct that error.
« Last Edit: May 16, 2020, 11:05:00 pm by codeguy »

Offline codeguy

  • Forum Regular
  • Posts: 174
    • View Profile
Re: Binary Search
« Reply #9 on: May 16, 2020, 11:09:25 pm »
Option explicit to the rescue.
Also duly noted. Thanks, Felipe. Darn Weily bluetooth keyboard :).

Offline Ashish

  • Forum Resident
  • Posts: 630
  • Never Give Up!
    • View Profile
Re: Binary Search
« Reply #10 on: May 17, 2020, 12:00:16 pm »
Wow! Binary Search is a lot faster than linear search.

  [ You are not allowed to view this attachment ]  
if (Me.success) {Me.improve()} else {Me.tryAgain()}


My Projects - https://github.com/AshishKingdom?tab=repositories
OpenGL tutorials - https://ashishkingdom.github.io/OpenGL-Tutorials

Offline codeguy

  • Forum Regular
  • Posts: 174
    • View Profile
Re: Binary Search
« Reply #11 on: May 17, 2020, 03:35:46 pm »
This has been changed to best answer as it accomplishes exactly the same thing except even faster. Simplified Binary search code, using \ 2 instead of / 2 and changed IF-ELSE block to SELECT CASE, dropping time at N=16777216 to less than 11s versus a shade over 14s for a roughly 20% increase in performance: The highly edited Binary Search SUB tested on a dataset 8 times bigger than this. The result at this number is even more astounding at nearly 1300 times faster than slowpoke linear search.

Code: [Select]
SUB BinarySearch (CGSortLibArr() AS _INTEGER64, BinarySearch_Start AS _INTEGER64, BinarySearch_Finish AS _INTEGER64, BinarySearch_SearchTarget AS _INTEGER64, BinarySearch_where AS _INTEGER64, BinarySearch_errorflag AS INTEGER)
    BinarySearch_errorflag = 0
    '********************    These must be the same numerical type as the variable parameters they hold.
    DIM BinarySearch_L AS _INTEGER64: BinarySearch_L = BinarySearch_Start
    DIM BinarySearch_C AS _INTEGER64: BinarySearch_C = BinarySearch_Start
    DIM BinarySearch_H AS _INTEGER64: BinarySearch_H = BinarySearch_Finish
    '********************
    DO
        BinarySearch_C = BinarySearch_L + (BinarySearch_H - BinarySearch_L) \ 2
        SELECT CASE CGSortLibArr(BinarySearch_C)
            CASE IS < BinarySearch_SearchTarget
                BinarySearch_L = BinarySearch_C + 1
            CASE IS > BinarySearch_SearchTarget
                BinarySearch_H = BinarySearch_C - 1
            CASE ELSE
                BinarySearch_where = BinarySearch_C
                EXIT SUB
        END SELECT
    LOOP UNTIL BinarySearch_L > BinarySearch_H
    BinarySearch_errorflag = -1
END SUB
Code: [Select]
'CgBinaryVersusLinearSearch
TYPE range
    lower AS _INTEGER64
    upper AS _INTEGER64
END TYPE
TYPE ArrayDescript
    ArrayBounds AS range
    ArraySorted AS range
    index AS _INTEGER64
END TYPE
REDIM SearchedArray(0 TO 16777215) AS _INTEGER64
REDIM SearchedArrayD AS ArrayDescript
SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower = LBOUND(SearchedArray)
SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper = UBOUND(SearchedArray)
SearchedArrayD.ArraySorted.lower = LBOUND(SearchedArray)
SearchedArrayD.ArraySorted.upper = LBOUND(SearchedArray)
SetArray SearchedArray(), SearchedArrayD, SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower, SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper

PRINT "sorting..."; (SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper - SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower + 1); TIMER(.001)
QuickSortIterative SearchedArray(), SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower, SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper, 0
PRINT "sorted..."; TIMER(.001)
PRINT "PERFORMING SERACH OF ALL ELEMENTS USING BINARY SEARCH"
DIM SearchedArray_where AS _INTEGER64
BinarySearchsTART! = TIMER(.001)
DO
    'PRINT SearchedArray(SearchedArrayD.index)
    BinarySearch SearchedArray(), SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower, SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper, SearchedArray(SearchedArrayD.index), SearchedArray_where, SearchedArray_error
    IF SearchedArray_error THEN
        STOP
    ELSE
        SearchedArrayD.index = SearchedArrayD.index + 1
    END IF
    'IF SearchedArrayD.index MOD 10000 = 0 THEN
    '    LOCATE , 1
    '    PRINT SearchedArrayD.index;
    'END IF
LOOP UNTIL SearchedArrayD.index > SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper
BinarySearchFinish! = TIMER(.001)
PRINT
PRINT "Binary Search took "; BinarySearchFinish! - BinarySearchsTART!; " seconds"
SearchedArrayD.index = SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower
DIM LinearSearchStart!: LinearSearchStart! = TIMER(.001)
DIM LinearSearchfINISH!: LinearSearchfINISH! = LinearSearchStart!
DIM LSI AS _INTEGER64
DIM lSIeRROR AS INTEGER: lSIeRROR = 0
PRINT "Starting linear search until time meets or exceeds time used by Binary Search"
DO
    LSI = SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower
    DO
        IF LSI > SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper THEN
            lSIeRROR = -1
            EXIT DO
        END IF
        IF SearchedArray(LSI) = SearchedArray(SearchedArrayD.index) THEN EXIT DO
        LSI = LSI + 1
    LOOP
    IF lSIeRROR THEN
        STOP
    END IF
    SearchedArrayD.index = SearchedArrayD.index + 1
    LinearSearchfINISH! = TIMER(.001)
LOOP UNTIL (LinearSearchfINISH! - LinearSearchStart!) > BinarySearchFinish! - BinarySearchsTART! OR SearchedArrayD.index > SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper
PRINT "LINEAR SEARCH FOUND"; SearchedArrayD.index; "iTEMS IN THE TIME BINARY SEARCH DID."
PRINT "Binary search performed "; (SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper - SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower + 1) / SearchedArrayD.index; "times faster."
PRINT "yet Linear Search was only able to cover"; 100 * (SearchedArrayD.index / (SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper - SearchedArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower + 1)); "%."


'* simply fills a numeric array with numbers between SetArray_min and SetArray_max, inclusively
'* in a large enough array, SetArray_min and SetArray_max will appear at least once.
SUB SetArray (a() AS _INTEGER64, ArrayD AS ArrayDescript, SetArray_min AS _INTEGER64, SetArray_max AS _INTEGER64)
    ArrayD.index = ArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower
    DO
        a(ArrayD.index) = SetArray_min + (SetArray_max - SetArray_min) * RND
        ArrayD.index = ArrayD.index + 1
    LOOP UNTIL ArrayD.index > ArrayD.ArrayBounds.upper
    ArrayD.index = ArrayD.ArrayBounds.lower
END SUB

'********************
'* Binary search is roughly the way one seeks a particular name entry in a sorted
'* phone directory. It examines the middle element and disregards the half this
'* searched object cannot be in. For very long lists and arrays It is MUCH faster
'* than linear search which must look through all entries until a match is found or
'* the end of the list is reached without a match. This version of Binary Search
'' quits as soon as a match is found or the indexes BinarySearch_L and BinarySearch_H
'* cross, which indicates the item being searched simply is not contained in the
'* searched list. The average number of iterations for Binary Search is
'* 1 + Floor(Log(BinarySearch_Finish - BinarySearch_Start + 1) / Log(2))
'* Binary search cannot be used on unsorted arrays or lists. This version also avoids
'* overflow when calculating BinarySearch_M, a hidden mistake programmers can very
'* easily overlook. Every doubling of input size makes this search algorithm perform
'* only 1 more very fast iteration of the Binary Search code body, making this a
'* logarithmic class complexity. The official complexity classification is O(LogN).
'********************
SUB BinarySearch (CGSortLibArr() AS _INTEGER64, BinarySearch_Start AS _INTEGER64, BinarySearch_Finish AS _INTEGER64, BinarySearch_SearchTarget AS _INTEGER64, BinarySearch_where AS _INTEGER64, BinarySearch_errorflag AS INTEGER)
    BinarySearch_errorflag = 0
    '********************    These must be the same numerical type as the variable parameters they hold.
    DIM BinarySearch_L AS _INTEGER64: BinarySearch_L = BinarySearch_Start
    DIM BinarySearch_C AS _INTEGER64: BinarySearch_M = BinarySearch_Start
    DIM BinarySearch_H AS _INTEGER64: BinarySearch_H = BinarySearch_Finish
    '********************
    DO
        BinarySearch_C = BinarySearch_L + (BinarySearch_H - BinarySearch_L) \ 2
        SELECT CASE CGSortLibArr(BinarySearch_C)
            CASE IS < BinarySearch_SearchTarget
                BinarySearch_L = BinarySearch_C + 1
            CASE IS > BinarySearch_SearchTarget
                BinarySearch_H = BinarySearch_C - 1
            CASE ELSE
                BinarySearch_where = BinarySearch_C
                EXIT SUB
        END SELECT
    LOOP UNTIL BinarySearch_L > BinarySearch_H
    BinarySearch_errorflag = -1
END SUB

SUB QuickSortIterative (CGSortLibArr() AS _INTEGER64, QSIStart AS _INTEGER64, QSIFinish AS _INTEGER64, order&)
    DIM QSI_Local_Compare AS DOUBLE '* MUST be same type as element of CGSortLibArr()
    '* These MUST be the appropriate type for the range being sorted
    DIM QSI_Local_I AS _INTEGER64
    DIM QSI_local_J AS _INTEGER64
    DIM QSI_Local_Hi AS _INTEGER64
    DIM QSI_Local_Low AS _INTEGER64
    DIM QSI_Local_Mid AS _INTEGER64
    '****************************************************************

    '* Integer suffices for QSI_Local_MinStackPtr unless you're sorting more than 2^32767 elements.
    DIM QSI_Local_MinStackPtr AS INTEGER: QSI_Local_MinStackPtr = 0
    DIM QSI_Local_QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr AS INTEGER: QSI_Local_QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr = 0
    DIM QSI_Local_FinishMinusStart AS _INTEGER64: QSI_Local_FinishMinusStart = QSIFinish - QSIStart
    DIM QSI_local_Remainder AS INTEGER

    '* yes, the equation log(QSIfinish-QSIstart)/log(2)+1 works too
    DO
        QSI_local_Remainder = QSI_Local_FinishMinusStart - (2 * INT(QSI_Local_FinishMinusStart / 2))
        QSI_Local_FinishMinusStart = (QSI_Local_FinishMinusStart - QSI_local_Remainder) / 2
        QSI_Local_MinStackPtr = QSI_Local_MinStackPtr + 1
    LOOP UNTIL QSI_Local_FinishMinusStart < 1

    '* MUST be appropriate type to handle the range (QSIfinish-QSIstart) being sorted
    DIM QSI_LStack(0 TO QSI_Local_MinStackPtr, 0 TO 1) AS _INTEGER64

    QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr = 0
    QSI_LStack(QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr, 0) = QSIStart
    QSI_LStack(QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr, 1) = QSIFinish
    DO
        QSI_Local_Low = QSI_LStack(QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr, 0)
        QSI_Local_Hi = QSI_LStack(QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr, 1)
        DO
            QSI_Local_I = QSI_Local_Low
            QSI_local_J = QSI_Local_Hi
            QSI_Local_Mid = QSI_Local_Low + (QSI_Local_Hi - QSI_Local_Low) \ 2
            QSI_Local_Compare = CGSortLibArr(QSI_Local_Mid)
            SELECT CASE order&
                CASE 1
                    DO
                        DO WHILE CGSortLibArr(QSI_Local_I) < QSI_Local_Compare
                            QSI_Local_I = QSI_Local_I + 1
                        LOOP
                        DO WHILE CGSortLibArr(QSI_local_J) > QSI_Local_Compare
                            QSI_local_J = QSI_local_J - 1
                        LOOP
                        IF QSI_Local_I <= QSI_local_J THEN
                            SWAP CGSortLibArr(QSI_Local_I), CGSortLibArr(QSI_local_J)
                            QSI_Local_I = QSI_Local_I + 1
                            QSI_local_J = QSI_local_J - 1
                        END IF
                    LOOP UNTIL QSI_Local_I > QSI_local_J
                CASE ELSE
                    DO
                        DO WHILE CGSortLibArr(QSI_Local_I) > QSI_Local_Compare
                            QSI_Local_I = QSI_Local_I + 1
                        LOOP
                        DO WHILE CGSortLibArr(QSI_local_J) < QSI_Local_Compare
                            QSI_local_J = QSI_local_J - 1
                        LOOP
                        IF QSI_Local_I <= QSI_local_J THEN
                            SWAP CGSortLibArr(QSI_Local_I), CGSortLibArr(QSI_local_J)
                            QSI_Local_I = QSI_Local_I + 1
                            QSI_local_J = QSI_local_J - 1
                        END IF
                    LOOP UNTIL QSI_Local_I > QSI_local_J
            END SELECT
            IF QSI_local_J - QSI_Local_Low < QSI_Local_Hi - QSI_Local_I THEN
                IF QSI_Local_I < QSI_Local_Hi THEN
                    QSI_LStack(QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr, 0) = QSI_Local_I
                    QSI_LStack(QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr, 1) = QSI_Local_Hi
                    QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr = QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr + 1
                END IF
                QSI_Local_Hi = QSI_local_J
            ELSE
                IF QSI_Local_Low < QSI_local_J THEN
                    QSI_LStack(QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr, 0) = QSI_Local_Low
                    QSI_LStack(QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr, 1) = QSI_local_J
                    QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr = QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr + 1
                END IF
                QSI_Local_Low = QSI_Local_I
            END IF
        LOOP WHILE QSI_Local_Low < QSI_Local_Hi
        QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr = QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr - 1
    LOOP UNTIL QSI_local_CurrentStackPtr < 0
END SUB
[T/code]
« Last Edit: May 18, 2020, 06:35:42 am by codeguy »