A look to QB64 from the external of QB64 community

[TempodiBasic]

Hi guys

searching a file to build up a little demo I find this news of this year about QB64 and its community!

What do you think about how we seem to the WWW?
What is not present in our QB64 to let it appear a good enviroment of development today?

Thanks to read and for feedbacks

PS: a view https://hackaday.com/2018/02/22/quickbasic-lives-on-with-qb64/

[pagetelegram]

1. What do you think about how we seem to the WWW?
2. What is not present in our QB64 to let it appear a good enviroment of development today?

1. I googled around about 10 years ago and found it that way looking for a 32/64 bit way to compile my old 16 bit DOS programs bc you can't expect noobs to know how to use DOSbox etc.

2. For me, it is good development platform for command line level. I have not tried the form option yet and I'm not too interested in it either. Everything just works better in DOS.

Also the introduction of the _STATEMENTS have expanded the use of the programming to modern application/device support

What I would like to see is audio sound card Input and Soft-Modem i/o use. Most audio stuff supported is only output.