Hi xra7en
So, why not using _PRINTF(), _SPRINTF(), _FPRINTF() etc. with all their relevant parameters that also take care of the right or left aligment as well as leading spaces?
Just my two cents.
simple answer - just trying to stay "native" :-)
and IMHO, I only use QB64 for basic / fun programing, I have my heavy hitter languages for the Clydesdale work :-)
Sure, you can both be "native" and use QB64 for fun.
I don't have a problem with that.
However, since:
a) QB64 isn't a 100 per 100 full compatible QB4.5 product "yet" (and obviously never will be);
b) Nicely extend the language with a lot of new functions,
c) Is able to include native C/C++ libraries,
d) and generate C++ code...
why not extend it with new native stdio.h C/C++ functions with dedicated names (e.g. _PRINTF(), _SPRINTF(), etc)?
You will not be obliged to use such extended functions that, however could solve problems to others trying different solutions.
The perfect exemple are the printf(), sprintf(), etc. functions that provides responses that the "basic" PRINT USING does not.
However, since QB64 can include native C/C++ libraries, I'm still expecting to undersand how to "include" the stdio.h standard input/output library with a code sample, a question that noboby never ever responded to for over 2 years.
So, is QB64 really capable to include such a so basic and standard C/C++ library?
If yes, PLEASE show me how to do so.
Just my two cents.
Cheers.
Fifi