I actually tested with an older 32-bit version. After all, there were no test restrictions :). It is currently still the best last 32-bit version to be released so far. The next newer 32-bit versions couldn't handle my code. I am currently using the 64-bit version because none of the newer 32-bit versions, as well as the older one in question, can compile due to the size of the code. For those interested -> in the upper left corner of the window is the coat of arms of my country :).
Applies to: QB64x32 v 0.82

will recursion still work?

Code: QB64: [Select]

1. Print Factorial_Recursive&&(5)
2.  
3. Function Factorial_Recursive&& (n As Integer)
4.     If n = 0 Then Factorial_Recursive&& = 1: Exit Function
5.     Factorial_Recursive&& = n * Factorial_Recursive&&(n - 1)
6. End Function
7.  

Is that a question for me?
If so, it displays the result 120 after compilation

Hello
What's the problem?.
For me it displays as a result of compilation: 5 stars and 1

Thank you. What you've changed that now displays properly. I can't see myself.

Hello.
Maybe someone will look at the code. Well, it shows me two letters instead of one under the CHR $ code (136).
Thanks

Hello.
Can anything be done about this problem?. Must it be like this for eternity.
S# =

In my free time I will test and inform.

Regards - Ryster

Perhaps this problem has already been raised. As I wrote. With the same input data, the result is different. Except that the 32-bit version counts correctly. I suspect a different rounding procedure inside the 64 bit compiler.