Author Topic: “Back To BASICs Can Be A Good Idea” at The Broadcasters' Desktop Resource  (Read 4948 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

FellippeHeitor

  • Guest
“Back To BASICs Can Be A Good Idea” at The Broadcasters' Desktop Resource:
https://www.thebdr.net/back-to-basics-can-be-a-good-idea/

Offline Cobalt

  • QB64 Developer
  • Forum Resident
  • Posts: 878
  • At 60 I become highly radioactive!
    • View Profile
Sweet!
Granted after becoming radioactive I only have a half-life!

Marked as best answer by on October 18, 2024, 07:53:33 pm

Offline Petr

  • Forum Resident
  • Posts: 1720
  • The best code is the DNA of the hops.
    • View Profile
Thanks for sharing. I was really pleased with this.

Offline doppler

  • Forum Regular
  • Posts: 241
    • View Profile
I remember playing with Dartmouth basic on 8080 assembler long ago.  It was a little quirky with a limit of 32K ram.  When bit 15 (8000H) was on it meant something different in the source code.  Fuzzy memory about using bit 15 to signify a jump to code in the lower 32k, mask bit 15 and call or go to address.  Used on goto, gosub and more spots.  Microsoft borrowed heavily from Dartmouth, for MSBasic.  So you could say Dartmouth Basic is the grandfather of QB64.

Offline Dav

  • Forum Resident
  • Posts: 792
    • View Profile
Nice!

- Dav

Offline Pete

  • Forum Resident
  • Posts: 2361
  • Cuz I sez so, varmint!
    • View Profile
Now that was a very well done article. I dropped the author a line.

Pete
Want to learn how to write code on cave walls? https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/qbasic/qbasic-f1/

Offline ErnieTech

  • Newbie
  • Posts: 1
  • Can I haz tech cheezburger?
    • View Profile
The Zeitgeist du jour of coding seems to be focused on languages which in principle expand career opportunities or the that run on a RPi. What if Python, Golang or Ruby rub you the wrong way? What if your in-brain programming lexicon is firmly entrenched in QB and you only feel happy coding in a blue box?

I sit down with Python and I grouse. I sit down with QB and I grin.

That's my litmus test.
If Saturday night's alright for fighting, I'm staying home

Offline Pete

  • Forum Resident
  • Posts: 2361
  • Cuz I sez so, varmint!
    • View Profile
The Zeitgeist du jour of coding seems to be focused on languages which in principle expand career opportunities or the that run on a RPi. What if Python, Golang or Ruby rub you the wrong way? What if your in-brain programming lexicon is firmly entrenched in QB and you only feel happy coding in a blue box?

I sit down with Python and I grouse. I sit down with QB and I grin.

That's my litmus test.

Likewise, I doubt anyone could convince me there  is a language more Intuitive than QB / QB64.

Pete

- Running with SCREEN 0 up and phasers on _FULLSCREEN
Want to learn how to write code on cave walls? https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/qbasic/qbasic-f1/

Offline Qwerkey

  • Forum Resident
  • Posts: 755
    • View Profile
More deserved positive publicity.

The Zeitgeist du jour

Two European languages in one phrase; the European Commission will be beyond themselves!  I think that we should have also included Portuguese as a nod to our commander:

"Zeitgeist atual du jour"



Offline TempodiBasic

  • Forum Resident
  • Posts: 1792
    • View Profile
Too nice that article.
It confirms the point of view of Steve about the nostagic user of Qbasic that searches a way to bring again to life his BASIC code.
Programming isn't difficult, only it's  consuming time and coffee