@mdijkens - yes, that was a poor over simplification of nested Do Loops. The meaning and use of recursion I do understand and agree with your definition.
@bplus - thanks for your example. So it would appear each Do Loop would need it's own Subroutine. (There would be no Do Loop at all).And each Recursive subroutine would then call the other with stop value in just one of the Recursive Subroutines.
I've been trying to place a Do Loop within a recursive Subroutine and placing the stop value within the same recursive Subroutine. I was thinking the stop value may need to be in the Do Loop itself rather than the recursive subroutine. But....seems recursion best lives in a subroutine and not meant be associate with Do Loops.
Thanks Guys
I've been trying to place a Do Loop within a recursive Subroutine and placing the stop value within the same recursive Subroutine. I was thinking the stop value may need to be in the Do Loop itself rather than the recursive subroutine. But....seems recursion best lives in a subroutine and not meant be associate with Do Loops.
Thanks Guys
Couldn't leaf well enough alone, could you?